Thursday, May 09, 2013

Norman Foster: Paris does not need skyscrapers.

Foster is quoted in le Figaro:

The most beautiful cities of the future will be inspired by today's most sustainable cities. And it does not mean that build up. Paris, London and Copenhagen are these cities. Of course, Manhattan is a shining example in terms of energy consumed, the presence of high buildings is beneficial. Many people go to work on foot, others use public transport. Few people own a car. But Copenhagen, Paris, Munich and Berlin are all cities in which to walk, they are durable and offer a high quality of urban life. You need a good mix of uses and buildings. Consider Copenhagen and Detroit, with a population and a similar climate: the second is three times higher population density than the other and yet it consumes ten times more energy, mainly because of gasoline. Under these conditions, I do not see how Paris would need skyscrapers.

translated by Google

Paris n'a pas besoin de gratte-ciel
Quote of the Day

May 9, 2013 in Architecture, Culture, Current Affairs, Quote of the Day, Travel, Urbanism | Permalink | Comments (0)

Monday, March 25, 2013

British Bus Shelter

CerneAbbasBusClick on the photo for a larger view.

The bus shelter is the small stone building on the left. You can see it in Google Street View or after the jump.

CerneAbbas

March 25, 2013 in Architecture, Current Affairs, Travel, Urbanism | Permalink | Comments (0)

It's Almost Enough to Make Me Forget How Much I Dislike the East Midtown Plan

Annual Inner Circle Dinner Show

Daddy Warbucks: "“Whenever I encounter an obstacle of some kind, I spend an enormous sum of my personal fortune, and I usually get my way.”

Hizzoner: "I never thought of that."

(Mayor Bloomberg paid for performers from four Broadway shows)

March 25, 2013 in Architecture, Current Affairs, Jokes, New York, Urbanism | Permalink | Comments (0)

Tuesday, February 26, 2013

The consensus in New York is building - Quote of the Day

Hudson_groundbreaking_29
"Buildings That Lean, What Will They Think of Next?"
What is new about the large corporate quarters now under construction is that they are all being planned and designed in a “whole cloth” fashion in a single glass and steel style for a single class of user and resident. The first of these zones—the World Trade Center Complex, Hudson Yards, Cornell’s Roosevelt Island technology campus, Atlantic Yards, and, if the mayor’s planning and real estate gurus have their way, the Sunnyside Yards in Queens—all have precedents in exurban corporate campuses and districts across American.
But in New York these corporate landscapes have a unique profile—except for the Cornell campus—in that they are built on concrete pads above parking and transportation lines that link them to the surrounding city and boost and their values as real estate. Like Battery Park City, which may be considered a precursor and a model for these developing quarters, they are purposely isolated and apart form the surrounding city like a suburban, gated community. The World Trade Center is the first of these places to arise in New York, and though it has the powerful Michael Arad memorial at its center and humanly scaled Snøhetta museum, we won’t really understand this landscape until the scaffolding and chain link fence come down on its perimeter. Though its plan partially inserts the old Manhattan grid into the project, from the look of it, it will be a monstrously scaled landscape of foreboding spaces, underground shopping, and bland skyscrapers landing on bare concrete. The quality of the area is typified by Tower One: the 1,776-foot-tall boring and bland middle finger to the rest of the city. This landscape represents a sad lost opportunity for what could have been a model of a mixed-use quarter that resembles the best parts of this metropolis. But this type of attention was never devoted to that other corporate city on a concrete pad, Hudson Yards, which seems to be planned for a commercial district of Houston rather than New York. The High Line will of course meander through this area and it will have at least one fascinating new urban type, Diller Scofidio + Renfro’s Culture Shed, which will roll along tracks just next to the elevated park. But from the looks of the shiny real estate presentation drawing of the area, it will likely be the most corporatized landscape this city has ever seen. Some may consider Hudson Yards a “planned” community but in truth it is the result of a process that only looks at the bottom line (and the Houston streetscape) not what this city has been at its best or might be at its best in the future.
Editorial, Architect's Newspaper

February 26, 2013 in Architecture, Current Affairs, New York, Quote of the Day, Urbanism | Permalink | Comments (0)

Saturday, February 09, 2013

Quote of the Day

An individual only has one life, and if during it he has no great environment, no community, he has been irreparably robbed of a human right.
– Paul Goodman, Growing Up Absurd

February 9, 2013 in Architecture, Culture, Quote of the Day, Urbanism | Permalink | Comments (0)

Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Glenn Beck: He's A Communist and That's Okay

LOTS OF NEW URBANISTS, including yours truly, have been running into Agenda 21 Tea Partiers who say New Urbanism is a Commie Socialist Plot, part of the New World Order the UN is imposing on us. So how do they explain the two new towns discussed by Jon Stewart?

The Daily Show with Jon Stewart Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c
America 2: Now With More Freedom - A Glenn Beck Holiday
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor & Satire Blog The Daily Show on Facebook

V&V: I'm a Communist and that's okay

V&V: The Revolutionary Communist Party Likes New Urbanism (sort of)

January 30, 2013 in Architecture, Culture, Current Affairs, New Urbanism, Urbanism | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

Quote of the Day - In which it is revealed that faces and posture can reveal much

I was reminded that Mr. Foster is also responsible for the canopied enclosure of the inner court at the British Museum, a pompous waste of public space that inserts a shopping gallery into the heart of a sublime cultural institution.
- Michael Kimmelman, In Renderings for a Library Landmark, Stacks of Questions, Still

That's a good sign. Most critics reflexively rave about the British museum, because it was designed by Sir Norman Foster.* It reminded me of something I wrote after a trip to England:

Watch the faces of people walking around Frank Gehry's Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao and you'll see happiness and contentment. Watch the faces of people walking around Renzo Piano's Morgan Library addition (or Sir Norman Foster's British Museum courtyard), and you'll see people who look bored, at best, or who have the pained expression of someone who's just been forced to swallow something that's supposed to be good for them, like Castor Oil.

* a nice guy, by the way

January 29, 2013 in Architecture, Classicism, New York, Quote of the Day | Permalink | Comments (0)