Architecture: I am not a Fashionista

STARCHITECTURE is both promoted and taught as the work architects should aspire to do. But really, it’s the equivalent of the High Fashion seen on the runways at fashion shows, where designers make extreme statements to be provocative and distinguish themselves among the cognoscenti.*

The man with the Lego face was photographed last month on one of the runways during London’s fashion week. No one expects that anyone will buy the costume and walk around looking like that. It exists in a world that sits on a top of a huge clothing industry, with many different options: American Eagle, The Gap, JCrew, Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger, Rag and Bone, Comme des Garçons, Tory Burch, and all sorts of brands we’ve never heard of, who sell through Target and Wal-Mart on the one hand, and small boutiques and clothing stores across the country on the other.

When you read Architect, the official publication of the AIA, or look at what architecture students are doing in most east coast or west coast architecture schools, most of the time it looks like Fashion Week. Much of the rest of the industry is often missing. MRDV’s exploding building in the second photo has been published many times. The architecture press usually praised it. The regular press was shocked that in any ground level view it looks like the World Trade towers exploding. It has almost nothing to do with the buildings designed by most architects today.

Among the many problems with this is that true art, which includes the best architecture, is made by people doing what they love. Forgetting for the moment that architecture is a public art, with a responsibility for shaping the public realm (a responsibility most “iconic” buildings ignore), architecture will be best when architects design buildings that reflect the architecture they love. Only rarely will that be “cutting edge.” I go to visit Starchitecture, and even love some of it, but it has very little to do with what I want to design. I am not a Fashionista.

* Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

This entry was posted in Architecture, Beauty, Classical, Current, Education, Good Kind, Urbanism. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Architecture: I am not a Fashionista

  1. Justin Lee Miller says:

    Exactly! People who are trendy have closets full of “dated” clothes. People who are stylish can wear the same thing for years. Perfecting style creates the real icons in fashion and architecture. Chasing trends means wasting a lot of money on something that will be considered tacky in the very near future.

  2. Pingback: Petition the mossback AIA | Architecture Here and There

  3. sam hall kaplan says:

    when it doesnt work as architecture, they call it art. The pity is that some practioners of modest talent start believing the hype generated by an undiscerning media simply looking for an angle tyhat calls attention to their mumblings. My long experience of being a critic as a user advocate is that architects like most people dont want criticism, they want praise.

  4. Andrei says:

    Love these pictures…love how she did some far away and some close up~very talnteed but it does help to have good subject matter too!

  5. Pingback: Form Follows Fashion » There are two types of architecture—good architecture, and the other kind

  6. Vipin Kumar says:

    Thanks for blog..
    Explanation on each point is also awesome….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *